|

Santiago,
Chile - October 27th and 31st 2002
DRAFT MINUTES - FINAL
ATTENDANCE LIST
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Felipe Urresta President SIM, INEN
Ismael Castelazo Chairman SIM TC, CENAM
Yoshito Mitani, Chairman, SIM PDC, CENAM
Hratch Semerjian SIM/JCRB Representative,
NIST
Steve Carpenter Technical Advisor, NIST
José A. Dajes Castro Coordinator
ANDIMET, INDECOPI
Luis Mussio Coordinator SURAMET, LATU
Evelyn de Vanegas On behalf of Coordinator
CAMET
Hermon Edmondson Coordinator CARIMET, BSJ
Paulo Ferracioli SIM Secretariat, INMETRO
João Jornada On behalf of Past President
Armando Mariante, INMETRO
Taynah Lopes de Souza SIM Recording Secretary,
INMETRO
OBSERVERS
Janusz Lusztyk NRC, Canada
Dianne Lalla-Rodrigues ABBS, Antigua and
Barbuda
Hector Herrera OAS
Raul Núñez INN, Chile
AGENDA
1. Introduction and Welcome / Introdución
y Bienvenida
2. Verification of Quorum / Verificación
de Quórum
3. Approval of Agenda / Aprobación
de Agenda
4. Approval of the Minutes from previous
Council Meeting / Aprobación de la
Acta de la Reunión Anterior del Consejo
5. Matters arising from the Minutes / Asuntos
derivados de la Acta
6. Progress on General Assembly Organization
/ Progreso en la Organización de
la Asamblea General
7. Discussion and Election of SIM Officers
during General Assembly / Discusión
y Elección de los Representantes
del SIM durante la Asamblea General
8. Other Business / Otros Asuntos
Meeting:
1. Introduction and Welcome / Introdución
y Bienvenida
President Felipe Urresta welcomed the
Council Members.
2. Verification of Quorum / Verificación
de Quórum
The quorum was verified, eleven members
of Council being present.
3. Approval of Agenda / Aprobación
de la Agenda
The agenda was approved with no amendments.
4. Approval of the minutes from previous
Council Meeting
The minutes were approved without amendments.
5. Matters arising from the minutes
The Council decided to send a letter
for Janusz Luztyk, NRC and Karen Brown,
NIST to congratulate them on their position
at CIPM.
6. Progress on General Assembly
Raul Nuñez reported on the organization
of the GA and related activities during
the SIM Week in Santiago.
Ismael Castelazo suggested to make a certain
specialization on the presentations, specially
between Ismael Castelazo and Yoshito Mitani,
to avoid duplication.
The GA shall be divided in blocks and a
new agenda will be made, more detailed.
First there will be the presentation of
reports of SIM Representatives in the morning.
In the second block during the afternoon,
there will be the presentation of Sub-region
reports. On the second day, there will be
the election for President. Right after
the GA we shall have another Council Meeting.
7. Discussion and Election of SIM Officers
during General Assembly
It was decided that the Secretary would
prepare the ballot paper for elections -
secret ballots in accordance to SIM Statutes.
8. Other Business
Hratch Semerjian presented the document
"End of Transition Period of CIPM MRA
- Review of Published CMCs", explaining
that Quality Systems should be implemented
to support CMC by the end of 2003 which
is the end of the transition period.
The following resolution was approved:
Resolution 07/02: A task force will
be set up to review QS implementations in
SIM members for the purpose of the CIPM
MRA, which will be formed by CIPM-MRA signatories
and chaired by the SIM representative to
JCRB.
Some additional comments were made:
The task force reports its findings on the
acceptability to the Council. Council shall
report its findings to the JCRB.
Any SIM Member can request the review of
their QS, even if they are not yet signatories
of the MRA.
A meeting to review QS of NMIs will be held
at least once a year. This meeting will
be open to all SIM Members and observers
from other RMOs, and will provide the opportunity
for discussion and comments.
Luis Mussio then mentioned that SIM was
the only region which made no presentation
at NCSLI this year. He also mentioned that
the best person to prepare this presentation
should be the president Felipe Urresta,
who agreed. Luis Mussio informed that December
is the deadline to prepare a presentation
for NCSLI for next year. The following resolution
was approved by the Council:
Resolution 08/02: Felipe Urresta
will prepare the SIM presentation to the
next NCSLI Meeting in Tampa, FL.
Steve Carpenter proposed to include NCSLI
as a Council Member no voting rights. The
Council approved this proposal and it will
be ratified at the GA. It was stated that
there's no need to change the Statutes as
they will have no voting rights. Council
approved the following resolution:
Resolution 09/02: Make an official
invitation to NCSLI to participate at the
SIM Council as an observer.
Dianne Lalla-Rodriguez mentioned their
interest of having a meeting in Antigua
& Barbuda. She was informed that she
should make a formal request and then it
will be decided.
Luis Mussio expressed the necessity of having
a person to make the translation of NCSLI
documents. Taynah Souza expressed the same
interest related to the translation of SIM
web site into Spanish. Luis Mussio will
try to solve this question within the Documentation
Working Group.
Having no further business the meeting
was adjourned for Thursday (or Friday),
after the GA.
SIM Council Meeting
October 31st , 2002
Neruda Hotel
Santiago - Chile
DRAFT MINUTES
ATTENDANCE LIST
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Felipe Urresta President SIM, INEN
Ismael Castelazo Chairman SIM TC, CENAM
Yoshito Mitani, Chairman, SIM PDC, CENAM
Hratch Semerjian SIM/JCRB Representative,
NIST
Steve Carpenter Technical Advisor, NIST
Oscar Harasic SIM Executive Secretary, OAS
José A. Dajes Castro Coordinator
ANDIMET, INDECOPI
Luis Mussio Coordinator SURAMET, LATU
Carlos R. Ochoa Coordinator CAMET, CONACYT
Hermon Edmondson Coordinator CARIMET, BSJ
Janusz Lusztyk Coordinator NORAMET, NRC
Paulo Ferracioli SIM Secretariat, INMETRO
João Jornada On behalf of Past President
Armando Mariante, INMETRO
OBSERVERS
Ed Nemeroff NCSLI
Dianne Lalla Rodrígues ABBS, Antigua
& Barbuda
Hector Laiz INTI, Argentina
Taynah Lopes de Souza SIM Secretariat, Inmetro,
Brazil
Anselm Gittens SLBS, St. Lucia
Theodore Reddock TTBS, Trinidad & Tobago
Willie May NIST, USA
Haygas Salustian Sencamer, Venezuela
Alexis Valqui PTB, Germany
AGENDA
1. Introduction and Welcome / Introdución
y Bienvenida
2. Verification of Quorum / Verificación
de Quórum
3. Approval of Agenda / Aprobación
de Agenda
4. Future Activities / Atividades Futuras
5. Matters arising from the General Assembly
/ Asuntos derivados de la Asamblea General
6. Other Business / Otros Asuntos
Meeting:
1. Introduction and Welcome / Introdución
y Bienvenida
Felipe Urresta, the re-elected President,
welcomed the Council Members.
2. Verification of Quorum / Verificación
de Quórum
The quorum was verified, thirteen members
of Council being present.
3. Approval of Agenda / Aprobación
de la Agenda
The agenda was approved without amendments.
4. Future Activities / Actividades Futuras
Next meetings were established as follows:
1) Council Meeting and Quality System Meeting
in Antigua & Barbuda, in January 14-16.
2) Quality System Meeting in Ottawa, Canada,
during the last week of May (28-30).
3) NCSL Meeting and Council Meeting in Florida,
in August 17-22.
4) General Assembly in Panama, in September,
probably between 14th and 19th, to be confirmed
by members in a week.
5. Matters arising from the General
Assembly / Asuntos derivados de la Asamblea
General
Felipe Urresta asked Hector Laiz about
the possibility of INTI publishing SIM magazine
"Infosim". Hector Laiz said he
will check it at INTI and will probably
have a response next week. Felipe Urresta
then stated that INEN shall be the second
option in case INTI can not publish it.
Luis Mussio raised a discussion about the
budget, as he said that there's US$ 5,000.00
left and the Council has to decide what
to do with it. Ismael Castelazo talked about
TC's expenses. Steve Carpenter and Luis
Mussio shall make a clearer calculation
of what's left and what can be done with
the money and they'll present it in the
next Council Meeting.
Willie May talked about the PTB-SIM Project
in Chemistry. He made a clarification about
the request for PTB's support, of US$ 250,000.00.
Steve Carpenter and Felipe Urresta asked
about the division of funds between PTB
and SIM within this program, which Willie
May explained that shall still be decided.
As the PTB-SIM Project is divided between
Accreditation and Chemical Metrology, some
members of the Council mentioned that it
would be interesting to know what amount
shall be appointed to each area. SIM has
to decide how to spend the money, but there
is no plan yet.
Alexis Valqui from PTB was invited to take
part at the Council Meeting in order to
clarify some points related to the PTB-SIM
Project. He first explained that the Project
was approved in Germany and the money is
already reserved. He also explained that
in accordance to the proposal made by SIM,
there'll be four workshops: One in each
Sub-region (except for NORAMET) that shall
be paid by the Project. The Sub-regions
will have to decide when to have them.
Then he explained that the Project was built
for a period of five years, what means that
within this period we'll have the four workshops.
The Project also covers two comparisons
per Sub-region. It must be decided in which
areas these comparisons shall be held.
Janusz Luztyk then mentioned that the budget
approved was of 750,000.00 euros (for both
Accreditation and Chemical Metrology). The
limits are around 200,000.00 euros for Accreditation
and 550,000.00 for Chemical Metrology, discounting
the overhead.
Willie May explained that after the Chemical
Metrology Working Group Meeting tomorrow,
he'll have a better idea of the detailed
budget. However, the detailed budget will
probably be ready within one month and shall
be discussed on the next council meeting.
Steve Carpenter raised the question of OAS's
role in the Project. He mentioned that funds
from OAS will be further reduced. It'll
then be difficult to get OAS funds for Chemistry
as they'll say we already have a program
with PTB.
Within this point, Hratch Semerjian also
mentioned that OAS will pay attention to
where the money is going and that it's important
that the money effectively goes to developing
countries, and the picture must be one that
shows complementation between OAS funds
and PTB funds.
Then João Jornada expressed his concern
about SIM interactions with laboratories.
He proposed a resolution stipulating that
all interaction between SIM and other organizations
should have the endorsement of the signatory
NMI.
Hratch Semerjian and Steve Carpenter intervened,
saying that this question should not be
discussed at that moment as they could see
no connection between the themes. They said
the Council should remain discussing PTB-SIM
Project.
Then João Jornada said that this
matter is very much connected with PTB-SIM
Project as he's afraid that the Project
could foster direct interaction between
SIM and Chemical laboratories in the SIM
countries, without the coordination of the
NMIs, which is the very representative of
the countries at SIM. This could weaken
the role of NMI in coordinating and representing
the metrology of their countries. He pointed
out that PTB interacts directly with Inmetro
in Brazil, thus helping Inmetro in its role
of coordinating the primary metrology in
the country. Steve Carpenter mentioned that
in his opinion it does not happen that a
certain institution gets involved in any
process without the awareness of NMI. Hermon
Edmondson then confirmed that it does happen
sometimes in CARIMET.
Supporting João Jornada's position
Janusz Luztyk made an intervention and explained
in his point of view how the question was
indeed related to the discussion of PTB-SIM
Project.
João Jornada then affirmed that if
this subject was not discussed, Brazilian
position would be against PTB-SIM Project.
He wanted more clarification on the interaction
of SIM with other organizations, emphasizing
that this issue should be brought up to
the NMI's analysis.
The matter was then discussed among the
Council and the following resolution was
proposed and then unanimously approved:
Resolution10/02: SIM interactions
shall be conducted only with the member
organization (usually the NMI) or designated
laboratories.
SIM representatives shall send to the secretariat
an updated list of designated laboratories
and contact persons. It is the responsibility
of the members to keep this list updated.
The Council then started a discussion on
whether the PTB money should come straight
from PTB to SIM or if it should come from
PTB to OAS to manage the funds and transfer
the money to SIM. The following resolution
was proposed and approved:
Resolution11/02: SIM Council welcomes
the offer of the German Government, communicated
by PTB, to provide partial funding for SIM
activities in the area of Chemical Metrology.
SIM Council recommends that an MOU between
OAS and the German Government be signed.
SIM Council also suggests that, consistent
with the normal mode of operation of SIM,
funds be transferred to the OAS Office of
Science and Technology for disbursement
to SIM member countries in accordance with
the approved program plan.
6. Other Business / Otros Asuntos
IAAC
Ismael Castelazo clarified that the problem
related to IAAC is an internal question
between EMA and CENAM that has no impact
on metrology issues.
The other question raised was about whether
or not inviting IAAC to be an associate
member of SIM. The Council discussed this
possibility and it was agreed that they
shall continue being invited to the GA,
but just as a guest.
Hermon Edmondson then asked the Council
to study the possibility of formalizing
CARIMET participation at CROSQ (Caribbean
Regional Organization for Standards and
Quality). The idea was that JBS would represent
SIM in this forum.
Hermon Edmondson also clarified that there's
no duplication between SIM and CROSQ and
that SIM should become a member of it.
Ed Nemeroff gave the idea of making a letter
to designate JBS as a liaison delegate so
that CARIMET can take part at CROSQ's meetings.
Hermon Edmondson will check other details
on this matter and then will work with Felipe
Urresta on the draft letter.
Jose Dajes then expressed his interest (shared
by other Sub-regions as CAMET and CARIMET)
in taking part at BIPM and other organizations
for whom they have to pay fees and they
haven't got enough resources. Jose Dajes
suggested that SIM could prepare a letter
to try to get more clarification on the
rules of such organizations. Felipe Urresta
raised the possibility of having a regional
membership. Ismael Castelazo expressed doubts
on the feasibility of this request as the
General Conference of Weights and Measures
(CGPM) is the only body that can grant this
request. The Director of the BIPM must follow
the resolutions of the 21st CGPM, where
the contributions of Associates are based
on their GDP.
Having no more points to be discussed the
session was closed.

|