|

Quito,
Ecuador, September 23 and 24, 1999
ATTENDANCE LIST
SIM Members
| Argentina |
Hector Laiz (INTI) |
| Belize |
Luis Cho (BBS) |
| Bolivia |
Juan Carlos Castillo (IBMETRO) |
Brazil
|
Marco Antonio de Araujo Lima (INMETRO)
Maurício Nogueira Frota |
| Canada |
Alan Robertson (NRC) |
| Chile |
Raúl Núñez Brantes
(INN) |
| Colombia |
Juan Pablo Angel (SIC) |
| Ecuador |
Felipe Urresta (INEN) |
| Guatemala |
Lester Hernández (COGUANOR) |
| Honduras |
Cristina Rodriguez (CICAP) |
| Jamaica |
Roosevelt DaCosta (JBS) |
| México |
Ismael Castelazo (CENAM) |
Paraguay
|
Victor Gonzalez (INTN) |
| Perú |
José Dajes Castro (INDECOPI) |
| Rep. Dom. |
Hugo Rivera (DIGENOR) |
| St. Lucia |
Anselm Gittens (St. Lucia BS) |
Trinidad & Tobago
|
Theodore Reddock (TTBS) |
| Uruguay |
Luis Mussio (LATU) |
USA.
|
Stephen Carpenter (NIST), (Technical
advisor), (TC Chairman) |
| Venezuela |
Sven C. Kirschstein (SENCAMER)
|
| |
|
|
Other Council
Members
|
| |
|
OAS
|
Oscar Harasic, (Executive Secretary) |
| México
|
Yoshito Mitani (CENAM), (PDC chairman) |
| |
|
|
Participants
|
| |
|
| Germany |
Reiner Schroerschwarz (PTB) |
| USA |
Klaus Jagger (NCSL) |
| |
|
|
Guests
|
| |
|
| Brazil |
Jose Joaquim Vinge (INMETRO) |
| USA |
Willie May (NIST) |
| USA |
Edward Nemeroff (NCSL) |
AGENDA
1. Accreditation of Delegates
2. Verification of Quorum
3. Approval of the Agenda
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous
meeting
5. Report from the SIM President (M. Frota)
6. Report from the Executive Secretary (O.
Harasic)
7. Report from the Professional Development
Comm. (Y. Mitani)
8. Report from the Technical Committee (S.
Carpenter)
9. Report from SIM Representative to JCRB
(A. Robertson)
10. Presentation of MRA/Appendix C (I. Castelazo).
11. Report of SIM strategic planning (O.
Harasic)
12. Presentation of SIM/OAS project for
2000 (S. Carpenter)
13. Ratification of Council Decisions.
14. Presidency Hand over ceremony (M. Frota-
M.A. Lima)
15. Subregions Break out to draft work plans
based on SIM/OAS 2000 project.
16. Reports by Subregions.
17. Action plan for 2000 under SIM/OAS project
(S. Carpenter)
18. Open space for other organizations participating
in the meeting.
19. Presentation by PTB (R. Schroerschwarz)
20. Presentation of NCSL (K. Jaeger, E.
Nemeroff)
21. Other bussiness.
22. Next General Assembly meeting.
23. Closing Session (M. A. Lima)
1. Accreditation of Delegates
All delegates present signed the attendee
list, which is attached to the minutes.
2. Verification of Quorum
Twenty Members' Delegates were present
. Rules of Order, specify quorum with 50%
of SIM Members' Delegates present and 25%
of each region. Quorum is verified.
3. Approval of the Agenda
NCSL presented the application for admitance
as participant of SIM. This application
will be treated in point 13. The agenda
is approved.
GAR
1/99 To approve the proposed agenda
for the meeting.
4. Approval of the minutes from the previous
meeting
GAR
2/99 To approve the minutes from the
meeting held in Heredia, Costa Rica, September
22nd and 23rd 1999.
5. Report from the SIM President (M.
Frota)
M. Frota read the President's Report
(annex I)
GAR
3/99 To accept the report presented
by the president.
6. Report from the Executive Secretary
(O. Harasic)
Oscar Harasic presented the Executive
Secretary report (annex I )
The points presented were:
-Y2000
project
-Brief report of Council meetings (Washington,
December 1998; Washington, March 1999; Washington
- Charlotte, July 1999)
-The Executive Secretary made references
to the launching of SIMNET program by NIST,
and the benefits that it will bring to SIM.
-The results of the strategic planning and
the folder with the results were presented
for onsideration of the delegates. The need
to continue with this program was stated.
-The need to improve the coordination for
Central America and the Caribbean in the
Metrological Information System was stated.
- The resolution taken by the council about
the equipment donated to SIM was informed.
GAR
4/99 To accept the report presented
by the executive secretary
7. Report from the Professional Development
Comm. (Y. Mitani)
Yoshito Mitani, chairman of the PDC,
presented the report of activities for the
period of October 1998 to July 1999. (Annex
I)
Y Mitani summarized the actions carried
out by his predecessors and compromises
given by the council meetings in June 1998
in Montevideo and March 1999 in Washington.
Considering the principal tasks assigned
to PDC, some activities and achievments
obtained in this period were presented.
In spite of the difficulties to celebrate
PDC meetings, most of the programmed courses
and workshops have been executed on schedule,
and also it was mentioned that the conditions
to have better communications among committee
members have been prepared through SIM directories,
web pages as well as SIM publications.
Finally the results of the first PDC meeting
held on September 20th were presented with
an eight-point proposal. One of the eight
points has been approved on the transfer
of USD $5000 of SURAMET activity to "Labeling
and prepackaging course" organized
by CARIMET/CAMET.
GAR
5/99 To accept the report presented
by the PDC chairman
8. Report from the Technical Committee
(S. Carpenter)
The Report of the Technical Committee
presented by Steve Carpenter, Chairman of
the Committee (Annex I).
The following information was presented:
-
Status of the SIM comparisons.
- Brief report of the results obtained with
SIMNET.
- Status of the measurements capabilities
database. All members are encouraged to
send their data.
- Courses and comparisons planed for 2000
in chemical metrology.
- Status of SIM directory (update of the
information is required to the members)
- Creation of new RMOs, MENAMET. NIST support
to MENAMET.
The delegate from St. Lucia raised the
point of participation in chemical comparisons.
Willie May answered (text provided by W.
May):
"We recognize that most countries within
SIM do not have one organization (e.g. NIST,
CENAM) that has total responsibility for
the entire spectrum of chemical measurements
services.
The majority of countries/economies must
establish a virtual laboratory consisting
of many governmental, academic and industrial
laboratories to cover the entire chemical
measurement universe.
The six comparison exercises planned for
the coming year are all pilot studies (vs.
Key comparisons) in that they are designed
to establish baseline measurement capabilities
plus training needs. Data will NOT be entered
into the Key comparisons database.
Our requirement for participation in these
pilot studies is that the participant laboratories
be only those that have or will have responsibility
for those type of measurements within each
country/economy measurement system.
Once these studies progress to Key comparisons,
those participating labs should only be
those that have "formal recognition"
from the respective governments and having
responsibility for those measurements that
the study is designed to assess."
GAR 6/99 To accept the report presented
by the TC chairman.
9. Report from SIM Representative to
JCRB (A. Robertson)
The report of the activities at the
JCRB is presented by Alan Robertson, SIM
delegate to the JCRB. (Annex I)
GAR
6/99 To accept the report presented
by the SIM representative to the JCRB
10. Presentation of MRA/Appendix C (I.
Castelazo).
Ismael Castelazo, chairman of the JCRB
working group for the definition of Appendix
C format presented the format approved for
the appendix C of the BIPM MRA (annex II).
This format will be used for the presentation
of the capabilities of the NMIs. Alan Robertson
already sent it to all NMIs of SIM and members
are required to update the information using
the new format.
The nomenclature for comparisons was presented.
Hector Laiz asked how does this nomenclature
apply to the inter-RMO comparisons. I. Castelazo
answered that in that case, one RMO must
be responsible and use its acronym in the
name for the comparison.
M. Frota asked how many comparisons had
already been defined. A. Robertson answered
that about 80 ~ 100. All the information
is at the BIPM web page.
11. Report of SIM strategic planning
(O. Harasic)
O. Harasic reported on the activities
carried out during the Council Meeting held
in Washington, March 1999.
M. Frota presented the results of the strategic
planning. (Annex III)
O. Harasic asked Mr. Favio Marinho to present
the information systems prepared on web
pages for IAAC, SIM and some Standards Institutes
of America.
12. Presentation of SIM/OAS project
for 2000 (S. Carpenter)
S. Carpenter made a brief report on
the procedure used to prepare and present
the Y2000 project to OAS. Copies of the
project are distributed to all delegates.
It is stated that the names are organizations
presented in appendix I of the project were
taken from the SIM directory, showing the
need to update the information.
O. Harasic stressed the need for the letters
of support. A model of the letter will be
sent to the delegates by the Executive Secretary.
13. Ratification of Council Decisions.
Council decisions 9/99, 12/99 and 15/99
were presented for ratification of the General
Assembly.
GAR
7/99 To ratify Council decisions 9/99,
12/99 and 15/99
CR
9/99 B Considering the letter of resignation
submitted by the President Mauricio Frota,
the Council resolves to request him to continue
serving in his position until next General
Assembly.
CR
12/99 B In accordance with article 5.2
of SIM Statute, the council accepts the
proposal submitted by the Brazilian authorities
designating the President of INMETRO, Dr.
Marco Antonio Alquerque de Araujo Lima to
serve as President of SIM for the remainder
of the 1998-2000 term, to be ratified by
the General Assembly.
CR
15/99 B Considering:
a)
The CIPM-MRA will be presented for signature
at the Directors Meeting on October 14th
1999;
b) the JCRB has indicated that the
first draft of appendix C of the CIPM-MRA
will be prepared early next year (2000);
c) the importance of this agreement
for the international acceptance of SIM
members capabilities;
Council resolves: to strongly recommend
a)
SIM members to submit their calibration
and measurement capabilities to the representative
to the JCRB and,
b) Metrology Working Groups to analyze
the existing data and prepare SIM submissions
to the JCRB.
The National Conference of Standard Laboratories,
presented the application for admission
as Participant of SIM.
CR
17/99 B In accordance with article 6.4
of SIM Statutes, recommend to the General
Assembly the admission of the National Conference
of Standards Laboratory (NCSL) as an Associate
Participant.
GAR
18/99 Considering: a) the widely recognized
importance of NCSL for metrology,b) the
fruitfull cooperation that NCSL and SIM
can establish, andc) the recommendation
of the Council in resolution CR 17/99The
General Assembly unanimously resolves to
accept the application presented by the
National Conference of Standard Laboratories
to become an Associate Participant of SIM.
14. Presidency Hand over ceremony (M.
Frota- M.A. Lima)
M. Frota explained the reasons to leave
the presidency of SIM and presented the
President of INMETRO, Dr. Marco Antonio
Albuquerque de Araujo Lima.
Dr. Lima is proposed by INMETRO as substitute
of M. Frota as SIM president.
The proposal is accepted unanimously.
GAR19/99
To accept Dr. Marco Antonio Albuquerque
de Araujo Lima as substitute of M. Frota
for the rest of the 1998-2000 term.
15. Subregions break out to draft work
plans based on SIM/OAS 2000 project.
Reports by Subregions.
Members were asked to break out into subregional
groups to prepare their reports and action
plans for 2000.
16. Subregional reports
The five subregions presented reports
on their activities during the year, as
well as proposals and work plans for the
1999-2000 period. The reports are included
as annex VI to these minutes.
The TC and PDC chairmen will coordinate
the actions under the OAS project according
to the proposals made by the subregions.
The subregional reports are presented in
Annex IV.
In the report presented by Carimet, is stated
the need for a survey of Metrological needs
and offer in the regions.
Ed Nemeroff offered the documentation of
the survey carried out by NCSL in USA and
Canada.
Raul Nuñez offered the documentation
used in Chile for a similar survey. These
documents will be sent to the Executive
Secretary for distribution.
17. Action plan for 2000 under SIM/OAS
project (S. Carpenter)
S. Carpenter thanks for the inputs received
from the Subregions.
This information will be analyzed and categorized
prior to sending it to the MWG chairs, including
the Legal Metrology Working Group, to optimize
the actions within the proposed budget.
The PDC chairman takes the information about
requests for training. A list will be prepared
and sent to the delegates to establish the
priorities before taking the final decisions.
It is requested the cooperation of the Institutions,
supporting the delegates and technicians
expense during comparisons and coordination
meetings.
M. Lima proposes to delegate to the Council
the final resolution on the Y2000 plan.
This will be done during the next meeting
in Venezuela, 2nd half of November. Deadline
to send the information is October 30th.
GAR 20/99 To delegate to the Council
the approval of the final action plan for
2000.Action: To prepare the prioritized
list of proposed activities to be sent to
the council. (S. Carpenter, Y. Mitani)
17. Open space for other organizations
participating in the meeting.
Sven C. Kirschstein, director of SENCAMER,
gave a presentation about the new structure
in Venezuela for Standardization, Technical
regulations, Quality and Metrology.
A copy of the presentation is attached as
annex V.
18. Presentation by PTB (R. Schroerschwarz)
R. Schroerschwartz presented a short
description of the activities and recent
changes in PTB.
A copy of the presentation is attached as
annex V.
19. Presentation of NCSL (K. Jaeger,
E. Nemeroff)
K. Jaeger and Ed. Nemeroff presented
NCSL-SIM a description of the activities
of NCSL and the fields for cooperation.
A copy of the presentation is attached as
annex V.
20. Other business.
-Sven Kirschstein, raised the point
of the need of simultaneous translation
for Council Meetings. Care must be taken
so that all the participants can understand
and participate in the discussions.
- Concerning SIM strategic planning, H.
Laiz stated that a 5 year plan for SIM must
include the cooperation among institutions
in the field of Research in metrology. May
be not in the next one or two years but
it is a must for a five years plan. His
point will be taken in consideration for
future actions.
O. Harasic answered that the plan is to
involve all the countries in the Strategic
Planning. It was not possible to be done
this year due to the cuts in the budget.
- R. Schroerschwartz stated that PTB does
not receive the SIM information regularly
and asked for the improvement of the distribution.
- K. Jaeger, urged SIM to designate a permanent
position responsible of keeping the archives
and SIM documentation. I. Castelazo supported
the idea of creating a Secretary similar
to Euromet or APMP, normally provided by
the institution holding the residency. The
procedures to assure the continuity are
needed.
GAR
21/99. To designate I. Castelazo and
L. Mussio to write the procedures to define
the responsibilities of the Secretary and
assure the continuity of SIM actions.
21. Next General Assembly meeting.
The delegate of St. Lucia proposed Jamaica
to hold the next General Assembly meeting.
The delegate of Jamaica, R. da Costa, accepts
this proposal.
The council in accordance with the JBS will
establish the final date.
GAR
22/99 To hold the next General Assembly
meeting in Jamaica. September -October 2000.The
council considering OAS fiscal year and
JBS proposals will decide the date.
GAR
23/99 To commit the Council to prepare
a calendar of activities for the year 2000.
22. Closing Session
F. Urresta thanks for the participation
of the delegates .
The assembly thanks M. Frota for the services
given to SIM during his presidency.

|